RAR Company
Analytical Review of Trial Balance for Audit Planning
1.0 Audit planning
A detailed analytical review of RAR
Company’s Trial balance has been done to plan audit process and identify key
balance sheet and Income statement items that carry significant risk of
material misstatement. In the course audit, total of five accounts shall be
selected based on materiality judgement, fraud risks and qualitative risks.
1.1
Analytical review
The Trial balance of current financial period is only provided for a period of 11 months i.e. July 1, 2016 – May 1, 2016. To facilitate comparison with financial year ending 2016, the Trial balance has been restated to cover period of 12 months, making certain assumptions. The horizontal analysis of Trial balance is shown below:
1.2
Preliminary judgement of materiality
The materiality test has been carried out
by following generally accepted benchmarks and range for deriving materiality
as shown below.
Net
Profit (PBT)
|
1,70,461
|
1,53,717
|
10%
of Net Profit
|
17,046
|
15,372
|
5%
of profit
|
8523
|
7686
|
1%
of turnover
|
1980
|
1875
|
1/2%
of turnover
|
990
|
937
|
Gross
Assets
|
5,34,941
|
5,07,150
|
1%
of Gross Assets
|
5,349
|
5,072
|
2%
of Gross Assets
|
10,699
|
10,143
|
After considering movements of various
items in Trial balance and benchmarks on profit, turnover and gross assets, the
materiality value has been set at 5% of PBT which is $7700. The accounts identified based on materiality
statement made above are:
·
Sales
·
Accounts Receivables
·
Equity
Further two accounts that have been chosen that
are considered to be at risk of misstatement due to qualitative reasons and
fraud risk are:
·
Cash at Bank (Fraud Risk)
·
Machinery (Qualitative Risk)
2.0 First account selected
Sales
2.1 Rationale
for selection
Sales of RAR Company have increased by 6%
or $11000, from FY 2016 to 2017 and thus fall within the range of materiality
value determined in the materiality statement.
2.2
Assertion and Explanation
Assertion Identified - Accuracy
Sales have increased by 6% but cost of
Sales show a slide of 4% which is unusual therefore it is important to assure
that fictitious entries have not been made to inflate sales.
2.3 Recommended
audit procedure
Identified category of audit procedure –
Substantive procedure
Identified audit procedure – Test of Controls
and documentation
The control procedures for recording complete
flow of sales including accounting entries need to be done by tracing Purchase
order, invoicing, stock issue entries, related vouchers and receivables. The
process must be leak proof in terms of duplication and backdated entries. The
procedure for backdated entries should be stringent and used sparingly only for
genuine cases after following line of approval.
(Gray. et
al. 2015. Zuca. n.d).
3.0 Second account selected
Accounts Receivables
3.1
Rationale for Selection
Accounts Receivables have shown an increase
of 7% which is $ 8977 and thus pose the risk of material misstatement.
3.2
Assertion and Explanation
Assertion Identified – Accuracy
Misstatement of Accounts Receivables can be
used for improving the financial performance shown by balance sheet. The
provision for bad debts and its adequacy must be estimated. Further there is a
trend in case of RAR Company where Cost of Sales has gone down whereas Sales
have increased which has an impact on Accounts Receivables. Also the increase
in sales in terms of value and percentage is similar which is unusual. Therefore
both the accounts should be carefully studied.
3.3
Recommended Audit Procedure
Identified category of audit procedure –
Substantive procedure
Identified audit procedure – Testing flow
of Transaction and Controls
Identify major customers and obtain balance
confirmation from them to establish the accuracy of balances. Further examine
the ageing report to identify long pending dues that might be disputed and may
require provision for bad debts. Perform a cut-off test to ensure that only
sales pertaining to current financial year have been recorded in the financial
statements. Examine purchase orders and invoices randomly to ascertain the credit
terms and their compliance. In case there is a departure from the agreed credit
terms, check approvals and communication regarding the same.
(Gray et
al. 2015)
4.0 Third Account Selected
Equity
4.1
Rationale for Selection
Equity balance of RAR Company has shown a
decrease from $ 139808 to $127451 which is a slide of 9%. This change falls
within the range of materiality value arrived and thus requires investigation.
4.2
Assertion and explanation
Identified assertion – Occurrence
Equity includes share capital plus retained
earnings. RAR Company has been registering profit yet there is a decrease in
its share capital. Possible causes of this fall could be payment of cash
dividends, purchase of treasury stocks or misstatement. There is a need to
establish the occurrence of event that has led to this decrease.
4.3
Recommended audit procedure
Identified category of audit procedure – Internal
Control Procedure
Identified audit procedure – Testing accuracy
of transactions and details of Balance
Determine the cause behind decrease in
equity and then trace the transactions that have been posted to effect this
decrease. A dividend payout or purchase of treasury stock needs board’s
approval. Check the minutes of board meetings held and resolutions passed and
signed to establish proper authorisation for the same.
(Puncel, 2008)
5.0 Fourth Account Selected
Cash at Bank
5.1
Rationale for Selection
The change in cash balance from 2016 to 2017
is just $814 which is much below the materiality level determined. However, by
nature cash carries an inherent risk of fraud. It is easy to misstate cash
balances and divert it if proper procedures and controls are not in place.
5.2
Assertion and explanation
Assertion Identified – Completeness
It is important to establish that all
transactions related to cash at bank have been recorded and none of the cash
receipts have been omitted or suppressed.
5.3
Recommended audit procedure
Identified category of audit procedure –
Substantive Procedure
Identified audit procedure – Test of
balances and internal Control
The first step is to obtain balance
confirmation from the bank and reconcile the balances. If there are any
receipts or transfers that have occurred towards the year end, then ensure that
the same have been recorded subsequently. Verify the procedure related to cash
handling, approval and posting process to identify potential loopholes and
leakages.
(Ramamoorti et al. 2017)
6.0 Fifth Account Selected
Machinery
6.1
Rationale for Selection
There is an increase in balance of
Machinery by $ 7000. Fixed asset accounts tend to show a healthy asset position
while giving tax benefits. It is pertinent to establish the cause behind this
increase and its correct recording in the books as it carries not only material
but also qualitative risk in terms of internal control and incorrect treatment
of purchase/lease.
6.2 Assertion
and explanation
Assertion Identified – Existence
The aim of audit procedure shall be to test
the assertion of existence of Machinery and increase in its value during the
financial year.
6.3 Recommended
audit procedure
Identified category of audit procedure –
Substantive Procedure
Identified audit procedure – Check of
documentation, transactions and physical examination
Check the fixed asset register and
Machinery account to ascertain the reason behind increase. Examine the invoice
for owner’s name, address, amount paid and date of invoice. If the machine is
leased then check the lease deed and ensure that treatment of lease in books is
as per the associated accounting standard. One must pay attention to internal
procedure of authorisation for purchase of machinery. The aforementioned steps
shall establish the correct treatment of transaction in the books in terms of
classification, cut off and amount. Check depreciation computed thereon as it
has bearing on the net value of asset block. Finally examine the machinery
bought to establish that the machinery exists and it is in good state.
(Gray et
al. 2015)
References
Zuca, S. (n.d). ‘Audit Procedures- Receivables and Sales’, Pg 184, 186, provided by Romanian-American
University in its journal Romanian Economic and Business Review 2013.
Puncel, L. (2008). ‘Audit Procedures 2008’, Pg 19.05, 19.04, Published by CCH,2007.
Ramamoorti,S. et al. (2017). ‘The proof of
Cash Should be King Among Forensic Auditing Techniques’, Pg 828,830, Published
in Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, Volume 9, July-December
2017.
Gray, L & Manson. S, 2015. ‘The Audit process:
Principles, Practice and Cases’, Pg. 455, 223, 233. Published by Cengage Learning EMEA, 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment